Powered By Blogger

Friday, December 21, 2018

Nebuchednezzar II involved in Sennacherib’s final campaign?


Assyrians at a Siege. Artwork by Johnny Shumate. Bronze Age, Ancient Near East, Ancient Rome, Ancient History, Military Art, Military History, Statues, Medieval, Sumerian
 
by
 
Damien F. Mackey

 
“Nebuchadnezzar, the "wicked one" ("ha-rasha'"; Meg. 11a; Ḥag. 13b; Pes. 118a), was a … son-in-law of Sennacherib (Targ. to Isa. x. 32; Lam. R., Introduction, 23, says "a grandson"), with whom he took part in the expedition of the Assyrians against Hezekiah, being one of the few who were not destroyed by the angels before Jerusalem (Sanh. 95b)”.
 
 

According to the standard interpretation of history one would hardly expect the young Nebuchednezzar, who began to reign in 605 BC (conventional dating) to have been involved in the ill-fated final campaign of Sennacherib (d. 681 BC, conventional dating), when Israel’s heroine Judith brought the massive Assyrian army to a shuddering halt at ‘Bethulia’ (Shechem). See e.g. my article:
 
 

 
In the less standard interpretation of events (e.g. my revision) this situation, a Jewish tradition, becomes quite possible, however. For, according to my reinterpretation of how things were, Nebuchednezzar II was the same person as Esarhaddon, the successor of - and thought to have been the son of - Sennacherib. See e.g. my recent series:
 

Esarhaddon a tolerable fit for King Nebuchednezzar
 
 

Esarhaddon a tolerable fit for King Nebuchednezzar. Part Two: Another writer has picked up this possible connection
 

 
Turning now to the Jewish traditions, or legends, we learn two interesting things about Nebuchednezzar, the second of which is his alleged involvement in Sennacherib’s campaign. About the first, that Nebuchednezzar was a descendant of the Queen of Sheba, I have mothing further to add at present: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/11407-nebuchadnezzar

....
 
—In Rabbinical Literature:

Nebuchadnezzar, the "wicked one" ("ha-rasha'"; Meg. 11a; Ḥag. 13b; Pes. 118a), was a son—or descendant?—of the Queen of Sheba by her marriage with Solomon ("Alphabet Ben Sira," ed. Venice, 21b; comp. Brüll's "Jahrb." ix. 9), and a son-in-law of Sennacherib (Targ. to Isa. x. 32; Lam. R., Introduction, 23, says "a grandson"), with whom he took part in the expedition of the Assyrians against Hezekiah, being one of the few who were not destroyed by the angels before Jerusalem (Sanh. 95b). He came to the throne in the fourth year of King Jehoiakim of Judah, whom he subjugated and, seven years later, killed after that king had rebelled. Nebuchadnezzar did not on this occasion go to Jerusalem, but received the Great Sanhedrin of Jerusalem at Daphne, a suburb of Antioch, informing that body that it was not his intention to destroy the Temple, but that the rebellious Jehoiakim must be delivered to him, which in fact was done (Seder 'Olam R. xxv.; Midr. 'Eser Galuyyot, ed. Grünhut, "Sefer ha-Liḳḳuṭim," iii.; Lev. R. xix.; comp. Jehoiakim in Rabbinical Literature). ….

 

Sunday, December 2, 2018

Some anchor points of early biblical revision


Image result for bible anchor


by


Damien F. Mackey




Anchor points of revision from Abram (Abraham) to David and Solomon.
My brief response to a would-be revisionist.



….

You have acted wisely, I think, in keeping a close eye on Dr. John Osgood for the correct archaeology from Abram (Abraham) through to the Judges.


For example:


  • Abram at Late Chalcolithic, with all of its other archaeological correspondences.

  • MBI as nomadic (Exodus) Israelite over Canaanite EBA III.

That one is, I believe, absolutely fundamental to any biblico-historical revision.


  • Shechem MB IIC for the city level of Abimelech.

  • Allowance for a reign of king Saul of less than 40 years.


I also like Joseph as Ptahhotep, which others (I, myself) have suggested. 

Though I have never been able to do anything relevant with Ptahhotep's presumed pharaoh, Djedkare Isesi (5th dynasty). 

I don't think that you have either.


I, too, have Moses in the 6th Dynasty. {But I have followed Courville (not in his details, though) in making the Old and Middle kingdoms partly contemporaneous}.


Thus, I would say, you have some very good anchor points for securing a competent revision. 


Some negatives for mine:



You have followed Courville in identifying the "Jabin" of the Mari letters (Zimri-Lim) with the Jabin of Hazor of the era of the Judges, thereby missing out on all of the marvellous syncretisms between Zimri-Lim and Hammurabi, on the one hand, and kings David and Solomon, on the other.

There were more than one king Jabin of Hazor, it appears – the name, “Jabin”, seems to have been a generic name for various rulers at Hazor. 

And you, having Abraham in the 4th dynasty, cannot (as also the case with Dr. Courville) make the important identification of Imhotep (3rd dynasty) with the biblical Joseph that so many others (myself included) have favoured.


Damien.