Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Thera chaos, the biblical Plagues and the Exodus

“Graham Philips tried to establish the Thera eruption as the natural tool applied to fulfill God’s plan. From a theological perspective, God created the forces of nature and they are HIS to use as HE pleases, so there is nothing unscientific or irreligious about attributing the plagues of Egypt to the eruption of Thera or to any other phenomenon”. T.S. Niazi I (Damien Mackey) am not completely averse to the theory that God may have used natural phenomena, catastrophism, to effect the Plagues of Egypt and also some aspects of the Exodus. I have been struck by the incredible likeness of the series of phenomena accompanying the Mount St. Helens eruption and the biblical Plagues - almost identical in some cases, except as to the order in which they occurred. So I would not discount the following, though I would not accept it in its entirety. For one thing, I believe that the pillar of cloud and fire was actually a supernatural phenomenon: the Glory of the Lord (Chavad Yahweh), commonly called “Shekinah” (not a biblical term). T.S. Niazi writes (2012): https://planet-earth-2017.com/the-exodus-mystery/ The Exodus Mystery The Exodus mystery was addressed by I. Wilson [1]. The book drew attention to the astonishing similarities between the biblical calamity that took Egypt by surprise and the likely effects on Egypt of the Thera (Santorini). The Mediterranean Island blew up. A tsunami did virtually wipe out the Minoan civilization in Crete and south of Greece. Eight years ago, I visited outer rim which stands out as the final remains of the erupted island. Plato called it the site where Atlantis disappeared. The eruption, which is estimated to have taken place between 1500 and 1600 BC and is only 800 km (500 miles) away from the Egyptian coast, would have rattled the windows of modern Egypt. The fallout cloud would have drifted high over Egypt and would have darkened the sky as described by G. Philips [2]. According to Exodus 10:21-23 ”21 And the LORD said unto Moses, Stretch out thine hand toward heaven, that there may be darkness over the land of Egypt, even darkness which may be felt. 22 And Moses stretched forth his hand toward heaven; and there was a thick darkness in all the land of Egypt three days: 23 They saw not one another, neither rose any from his place for three days: but all the children of Israel had light in their dwellings.” The event is attributed to a divine intervention. Graham Philips tried to establish the Thera eruption as the natural tool applied to fulfill God’s plan. From a theological perspective, God created the forces of nature and they are HIS to use as HE pleases, so there is nothing unscientific or irreligious about attributing the plagues of Egypt to the eruption of Thera or to any other phenomenon. In Exodus 9:23-26 we are told that Egypt is afflicted by a terrible fiery hailstorm: ”23 And Moses stretched forth his rod toward heaven: and the LORD sent thunder and hail, and the fire ran along upon the ground; and the LORD rained hail upon the land of Egypt. 24 So there was hail, and fire mingled with the hail, very grievous, such as there was none like it in all the land of Egypt since it became a nation. 25 And the hails smote throughout all the land of Egypt all that was in the field, both man and beast; and the hail smote every herb of the field, and break every tree of the field. 26 Only in the land of Goshen, where the children of Israel were, was there no hail.” Graham Philips goes on to attribute the Nile turning to blood to the eruption of Thera. Exodus 7:19 states, “And all the waters that were in the river turned to blood”. Thera had corrosive toxin in its bedrock: iron oxide. Wilson points out that in the submarine eruptions that still happen at Thera, tons of iron oxide is discharged that kill fish for miles round. Over the years, scholars have attributed the plagues described in Exodus to different natural phenomena. The darkness could have been due to a particularly violent sandstorm; the hail could have resulted from freak weather conditions; and the bloodied river may have been the result of seismic activity far to the south of tropical Africa. According to the Exodus story, the Israelites are led out of Egypt by following a “pillar of cloud by the day” and a “pillar of fire by night” (Exodus 13:21). Graham Philips attributes these phenomena to the Thera plume. The towering ash cloud over the volcano itself rose more than 48 km (30 miles). It would have been visible from the delta of Lower Egypt, given the curvature of Earth. If the Israelites had attributed the phenomena to the intervention of God, then they may well have started the exit following the direction of the sky sign, in the belief that it was a beacon leading them out of Egypt, to safety. According to Exodus 13:18: “God led the people round by the way of the wilderness towards the Red Sea”. The earlier interpretation of the Hebrew words “Yam Suph” as the “Red Sea” seems to have been incorrect. In fact, according to Phillips, it could mean “sea of reeds” or “sea of seaweed”, which could describe an expansive, large, shallow lake that is covered by reeds here and there. My theory is that Lake Burullus is more likely to have been the sea of reeds in the north of Egypt; it is perfectly situated along the exodus path. Lake Burullus is separated from the Mediterranean by a narrow ridge of dry land some 50 km (31 miles) long and is finally connected to the Mediterranean through a shallow inlet. From Avaris—south Mansoura city—the Israelites could have reached west of Lake Burullus within a couple of days by following the sign in the northwestern sky. As the sky sign moved past the Israelites, they realized that they would have to travel eastward i.e. around the lake at the Rasheed village; where the French expedition to Egypt, two centuries ago, found the famous Rosetta stone. The Israelites turned to the east instead of continuing west. They walked on the Burullus ridge. They reached the shallow inlet, 1,100 meter (3,600 feet) long and 200 meter (656 feet) across and 5 meter (16 feet) deep that connects Lake Burullus to the Mediterranean Sea, and they had to cross it. If the shallow inlet connecting the lake to the sea, usually underwater, had receded because of the tsunami force resulting from the Thera eruption, the phenomenon might indeed have saved the Israelites as the Egyptians were in close pursuit. The inlet would have turned into dry land and Lake Burullus, or the sea of reeds, would have been temporarily disconnected from the Mediterranean, as the Bible relates in Exodus 14:21 : “And the Lord caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night and made the sea into dry land and the waters were divided”. Exodus 14:25 tells us that when the Egyptians tried to pursue the Israelites across the sea of reeds they were hampered by the ground clogging of their chariots wheels, so they drove heavily. The tidal wave caused by Thera’s eruption would have finally helped the Israelites to escape untouched. The pursuing soldiers may have attempted to follow when the tsunami tidal wave hit, washing them away. Exodus 14:29 tells us, “And the waters returned and covered the chariots, the horsemen and all the host of Pharaoh who came into the sea after them; there remains not as much as one of them”. Several scholars consider it unlikely to have darkness, fiery hail, sores, a bloodied river, dead cattle and fish, swarms of locusts, flies and infestations of lice; all happening at the same time. However, I believe that there is another explanation for these events. What if the sky sign was the trace of a passing asteroid? Asteroids are sometimes called minor planets or planetoids. They are smaller than planets but larger than meteoroids. What if it was a comet exhibiting a coma, or tail of gases and hail? This could very well fit into the Bible description of “a pillar of cloud by day” and “a pillar of fire by night”. This could explain the sky sign that the Bible claims guided the Israelites out of Egypt. Not only could its magnetic pull have tilted the Inner Core magnet of the Earth, causing great Earthquakes, such as the Thera eruption, but could have also reduced the vertical component of the magnetic force and thus slowed down its rotation, forcing the planet to retard, so that one night lasted three days long. “And Moses stretched forth his hand toward heaven; and there was a thick darkness in all the land of Egypt three days”. The fiery hail covered the Egyptian sky, could have finally found its way to the Nile and turned it red. Depending on the mass of the planetoid and its speed and distance from the Earth, a negative pressure could have developed in the atmosphere at the point of proximity. A plume of air could have developed with a crest that pointed to the planetoid. Such a suction of air would have created a low atmospheric pressure at the surface of the Earth. This would have brought gale winds storming from the East to try to balance the drop in pressure “And the Lord caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind”. But, where did this planetoid come from, and where did it go? Is it going to come back again? Had it visited our solar system before? When and at what frequency? _______________________________________________________________ [1] Wilson, I. (1985). Exodus Enigma. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. [2] Philips, G. (1998). Act of God Tutankhamen, Moses and the Myth of Atlantis. HB Sidgwick & Jackson, PB Pan.

Monday, May 5, 2025

Dr. I. Velikovsky likely correct in his identifying Thutmose III’s Sk with Socoh in the Shephelah

by Damien F. Mackey Creationist Patrick Clarke, holding to the conventional route, will misidentify certain locations that Dr. Velikovsky had claimed were the newly fortified forts of Rehoboam. Following on from Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky’s biblically maximalising identification of “Shishak king of Egypt” (I Kings 14:25-26) with ancient Egypt’s “Napoleon” (professor Breasted), Thutmose III, of the Eighteenth Dynasty (in Ages in Chaos, I, 1952), I undertook the extremely challenging task of solving the geographical and topographical problems associated with that pharaoh’s First Campaign (Year 22/23), the one that Dr. Velikovsky had rightly identified as being the biblical campaign against Jerusalem in Year 5 of king Rehoboam of Judah. My reconstruction of this campaign can be read in articles such as: The Shishak Redemption (4) The Shishak Redemption | Damien Mackey - Academia.edu and: Yehem near Aruna - Thutmose III’s march on Jerusalem (3) Yehem near Aruna - Thutmose III's march on Jerusalem | Damien Mackey - Academia.edu Whereas convention, and Dr. Velikovsky - surprisingly in agreement with it for once - have the pharaonic campaign proceeding from Gaza, northwards, following a relatively easy coastal route to Megiddo (at which point Dr. Velikovsky will veer south, while convention will continue to go northwards, to Syrian Kadesh), I would have the Egyptian force, instead, proceeding from Gaza directly to Jerusalem - called Y-hm (Yehem) in the Egyptian Annals - which location was, as the above articles show, near the Aruna (of Araunah the Jebusite) road. As is apparent from these articles, I am much indebted to Dr. Eva Danelius for the identification of the ancient Aruna road with its tortuous topography that cannot be found anywhere in convention’s, or in Dr. Velikovsky’s, route northwards to Megiddo. Creationist Patrick Clarke, holding to the conventional route, will misidentify certain locations that Dr. Velikovsky had claimed were the newly fortified forts of Rehoboam: Was Jerusalem the Kadesh of Thutmose III’s 1st Asiatic campaign—topographic and petrographic evidence (4) Was Jerusalem the Kadesh of Thutmose III’s 1st Asiatic campaign—topographic and petrographic evidence | Patrick Clarke - Academia.edu Clarke, who is highly critical of Dr. Velikovsky’s reconstructions, will write as follows in this article: …. Velikovsky mentions three locations as being part of Rehoboam’s fifteen fortified cities. He wrote: “The walled cities fortified by Rehoboam … may be found on the Egyptian list [referring to Thutmose III]. It appears that Etam is Itmm; Beth-Zur – Bt sir; Socoh – Sk. …. Here is a new field for scholarly inquiry: the examination of the list of the Palestinian cities of Thutmose III, comparing their names with the names of the cities in the kingdom of Judah. The work will be fruitful.” …. Socoh – Sk Here Velikovsky is actually right about the name equivalence, i.e. Sk really is Socoh; but unfortunately for his thesis, there is an additional issue to consider, inasmuch as there were three towns called Socoh. Socoh 1 was the town fortified by Rehoboam … Socoh 2, mentioned only once in the Bible, in Joshua 15:48, is located in the southernmost district of the Judean hill country … Socoh 3 lies on the Sharon plain and not in Judah. The following explains which of the three is relevant to this paper: “Amenhotep II in his campaign against recalcitrant peoples mentioned it [Socoh], again in association with Yaham and other places in the Sharon. Socoh was strategically located not only on the N-S highway but also near the mouth of the Naḥal Shekhem, the main entryway to Samaria and Shechem from the west. The town appears three times in Egyptian records, and the contexts confirm its location vis-à-vis the other towns along the great international trunk route along the eastern edge of the Sharon plain. In the topographical list of Thutmose III, Socoh (no. 67) appears after Aphek and before Yaham [Yehem].” Thus the Socoh which Velikovsky so confidently held to be one of Rehoboam’s Judean fortresses is shown to be the wrong Socoh for his purposes; the one claimed as a conquest by Thutmose III, the one we have labelled Socoh 3, above, lies some 80 km to the north. …. [End of quote] Whilst Clarke’s placement of “Socoh (no. 67)” might well apply if the conventional interpretation of the route of pharaoh Thutmose III’s First Campaign were valid, it cannot possibly apply in the close association of it with a Yehem (Y-hm) that I have identified in the above articles as Jerusalem. It will be, as Clarke himself puts it, “some 80 km” too far away. Thus I believe that the intuitive Dr. Velikovsky was quite correct in identifying Thutmose III’s Sk with Rehoboam’s fort of Socoh in the Shephelah. Unfortunately, the Socoh in the Shephelah, which concerns us here, has not yet been unequivocally identified. What is certain from the Bible is that it lay close to Azekah: https://leonmauldin.blog/2010/10/21/socoh-in-the-david-goliath-narrative/ Socoh, in the David & Goliath Narrative Our recent posts have included aerial photos of Azekah and Khirbet-Qeiyaffa (Elah Fortress), both of which are in the Valley of Elah. (Some suggest that Khirbet-Qeiyaffa may turn out to be the biblical Ephes Dammim.) Another site mentioned in the biblical record and featured in today’s post Socoh. 1 Sam. 17 includes this site as the geographical setting is provided for the battle between the Philistines and the Israelites, when David killed Goliath. The text reads: Now the Philistines gathered their armies for battle; and they were gathered at Socoh which belongs to Judah, and they camped between Socoh and Azekah, in Ephes-dammim. Saul and the men of Israel were gathered and camped in the valley of Elah, and drew up in battle array to encounter the Philistines. The Philistines stood on the mountain on one side while Israel stood on the mountain on the other side, with the valley between them. (1 Sam. 17:1-3) Our photo shows tel Socoh in center (look to the left and above the horizontal road that dissects the field in center). If you note the tiny tree-line above tel Socoh, across the road, this is the brook from which David selected five smooth stones, one of which he used to slay Goliath. In the distance (just right of wing brace at top) you can see tel Azekah. For 40 days this valley rang out with the threatening voice of loud-mouth Goliath, until the shepherd David rose to the challenge, prompted by this faith in the God of Israel. Socoh (also spelled Sochoh and Soco) had earlier been assigned to the territory of Judah (Josh. 15:35). Later it was fortified by Solomons’ son King Rehoboam (2 Chron. 11:7). Later still, in the days of King Kezekiah, Socoh was among the cities of the Shephelah listed in 2 Chron. 28:18 as raided and conquered by the Philistines. Apparently Socho had been an administrative center during Hezekiah’s reign as indicated by the numerous stamped jar handles with the seal of Socoh.