Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, May 5, 2026

Pharaoh Sneferu

 



by

 

Damien F. Mackey

 

 

 

“Snofru soon became a legendary figure, and literature in later periods credited him with a genial personality”.

 

“Cheops ... is portrayed in [Papyrus Westcar] as the traditional legendary oriental monarch, good-natured …”.

 

Nicolas Grimal

 

 

 

Introduction

 

Throughout various articles now I have concluded that the ancient Egyptian dynasty that oppressed the Israelites at the time of Moses consisted of only four rulers, with the other names being duplicates, or triplicates. These rulers were, in order:

 

1.       The “new king” of Exodus 1:8, who began the Oppression of Israel;

2.       Moses, presumed son of 1., who ruled briefly and who then abdicated;

3.      “Chenephres” of tradition, married to “Merris’ of tradition, the Egyptian foster-mother of Moses; and, lastly, a

4.      Female Pharaoh.

 

And I have further concluded that the life of the historical Moses actually spans two kingdoms (Old and ‘Middle’), conventionally speaking, and five dynasties (4th; 5th; 6th; 12th and 13th).

 

As was the case with Joseph, son of Jacob, the life of Moses starkly reveals the inadequacies of the received Egyptian dynastic history and completely reforms it.

 

Here we are concerned only with Egypt’s so-called 4th dynasty, the Giza pyramid and Sphinx building dynasty.

 

Fourth Dynasty of Egypt

 

My re-setting of ancient Egypt via Moses necessitates an alteration to the first part of the Fourth Dynasty king list (1-4):

 

1 Sneferu

2 Khufu

3 Djedefre

4 Khafre

 

Four kings now needing to become three.

 

While kings 2-4 here now become fairly straightforward, 1. Sneferu (Snofru) I have found to be something of an outlier.

 

2. Khufu (Cheops), whose daughter Meresankh married 4. Khafre (Chephren), is clearly the oppressive “new king” of Exodus 1:8, the dynastic founder, with Meresankh being “Merris”, the traditional (Artapanus) foster-mother of Moses, who married “Chenephres”, 4. Khafre (Chephren).

 

That leaves 3. Djedefre, the presumed son of Khufu, as the brief-reigning Moses.

 

Sneferu (Snofru)

 

1.                   Sneferu, a long-reigning king, can thus immediately be ruled out as Moses.

 

Arguments could be mounted for Sneferu (“a genial personality”) to have been Cheops, “good-natured” (though tell that to the Israelites groaning under his oppression), or Sneferu, who was likewise (as was Khafre) associated with a Meresankh.

 

Previously I had written on this, following Nicolas Grimal (A History of Ancient Egypt, 1992):

 

Meresankh (“Merris”)

 

P. 170

 

Snofru is also associated with a Meresankh, though she is considered to be his mother.

P. 67 [She was] one of Huni’s concubines. There is no definite proof of this ....

 

Meresankh will become something of a golden thread, linking the traditional “Merris” of Moses’ childhood to the 4th Dynasty …. 

 

Likenesses to Cheops

 

This (somewhat semi-legendary) ruler, Sneferu, seems to me to connect well with Cheops in various ways. For instance (the pages are taken from N. Grimal’s A History of Ancient Egypt):

 

Great “legendary” reputation – good natured

 

P. 67

 

.... Snofru soon became a legendary figure, and literature in later [?] periods credited him with a genial personality. He was even deified in the Middle Kingdom, becoming the ideal king who later Egyptian rulers … sought to emulate when they were attempting to legitimize their power.  

 

P. 70

 

Cheops ... is portrayed in [Papyrus Westcar] as the traditional legendary oriental monarch, good-natured, and eager to be shown magical things, amiable towards his inferiors and interested in the nature of human existence.

Cult figure

 

P. 67

 

Snofru’s enviable reputation with later rulers, which according to the onomastica was increased by his great popularity with the people, even led to the restoration of Snofru’s mortuary temple at Dahshur. P. 69 ... cult among Middle Kingdom miners in the Sinai.

P. 165 There is even evidence of a Twelfth Dynasty cult of Snofru in the region of modern Ankara.

 

P. 70

 

Cheops was not remembered as fondly as Snofru, although his funerary cult was still attested in the Saite (Twenty-Sixth) Dynasty and he was increasingly popular in the Roman period. According to Papyrus Westcar, he liked to listen to fantastic stories of the reigns of his predecessors.

 

Like his potential alter ego Cheops,

P. 67 [Snofru’s] reign  ... appears to have been both glorious and long-lasting (perhaps as much as forty years).

 

Snofru built

... ships, fortresses, palaces and temples ...

Three pyramids.

 

If Snofru were Cheops, as I am thinking, then Snofru’s three pyramids - built perhaps early in his reign - would have been the perfect preparation for his later masterpiece, the Great Pyramid at Giza:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sneferu

Under Sneferu [Snofru], there was a major evolution in monumental pyramid structures, which would lead to Khufu's Great Pyramid, which would be seen as the pinnacle of the Egyptian Old Kingdom's majesty and splendour, and as one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World”.

 

Less positive picture of the king   

 

P. 71

 

... it is difficult to accommodate within this theory [building immoderation = unpopularity] the fact that Snofru’s reputation remained untarnished when he built more pyramids than any of his successors.

 

Pp. 69-70

 

[Cheops’] pyramid transforms him into the very symbol of absolute rule, and Herodotus’ version of events chose to emphasise his cruelty:

https://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/hh/hh2120.htm

 

124. ... Cheops became king over them and brought them to every kind of evil: for he shut up all the temples, and having first kept them from sacrificing there, he then bade all the Egyptians work for him. So some were appointed to draw stones from the stone-quarries in the Arabian mountains to the Nile, and others he ordered to receive the stones after they had been carried over the river in boats, and to draw them to those which are called the Libyan mountains; and they worked by a hundred thousand men at a time, for each three months continually. Of this oppression there passed ten years while the causeway was made by which they drew the stones, which causeway they built, and it is a work not much less, as it appears to me, than the pyramid; for the length of it is five furlongs and the breadth ten fathoms and the height, where it is highest, eight fathoms, and it is made of stone smoothed and with figures carved upon it. For this, they said, the ten years were spent, and for the underground chambers on the hill upon which the pyramids stand, which he caused to be made as sepulchral chambers for himself in an island, having conducted thither a channel from the Nile.

 

For the making of the pyramid itself there passed a period of twenty years; and the pyramid is square, each side measuring eight hundred feet, and the height of it is the same. It is built of stone smoothed and fitted together in the most perfect manner, not one of the stones being less than thirty feet in length.

 

Moreover:

 

126. Cheops moreover came, they said, to such a pitch of wickedness, that being in want of money he caused his own daughter to sit in the stews, and ordered her to obtain from those who came a certain amount of money (how much it was they did not tell me); but she not only obtained the sum appointed by her father, but also she formed a design for herself privately to leave behind her a memorial, and she requested each man who came in to her to give her one stone upon her building: and of these stones, they told me, the pyramid was built which stands in front of the great pyramid in the middle of the three, each side being one hundred and fifty feet in length. ….

 

Sunday, May 3, 2026

Thutmose IV may be Thutmose III procrusteanised, cut off really short

 


 

by

 

Damien F. Mackey

 

  

Added to this, Brian Alm has noted that reliefs of Thutmose IV actually

refer to his Heb Sed festival (“Thutmose IV: Placeholder or Pivot?”).

This usually indicated that the King of Egypt had attained to

three decades of reign.

 

 

 

In the ancient king lists we find kings and pharaohs, duplicated and even triplicated.

This comment applies to e.g. the Egyptian dynastic lists, the Assyro-Babylonian (Chaldean) king lists, and to the Medo-Persian lists. 

 

Archaeological data just cannot support so many kings as arise from these chaotic lists. On this, see e.g. my article:

 

Medo-Persian history has no adequate archaeology

 

(6) Medo-Persian history has no adequate archaeology

 

A most significant instance of duplication arises, so I would suggest, in the middle part of Egypt’s famous Eighteenth Dynasty:

 

Has Egypt’s Eighteenth Dynasty succession, Thutmose to Amenhotep, been duplicated?

 

(7) Has Egypt's Eighteenth Dynasty succession, Thutmose to Amenhotep, been duplicated?

 

THUTMOSE III, IV  

 

Having, as according to the above article, a double set of the pharaonic combination: Thutmose – Amenhotep, in the Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt:

 

Tuthmosis III
Amenhotep II

Tuthmosis IV
Amenhotep III

inevitably makes me wonder, suspiciously, if, as in the case of Egypt’s Old-Middle Kingdoms, some duplications may have occurred, thereby unwarrantedly extending the already lengthy dynastic history of ancient Egypt:

 

Egypt’s Old and Middle Kingdoms far closer in time than conventionally thought

 

(8) Egypt's Old and Middle Kingdoms far closer in time than conventionally thought

 

I have greatly streamlined those Old-Middle Kingdom dynasties in earlier articles, wherein there occur such repetitive combinations as: Pepi – Merenre (so-called Sixth Dynasty) and Amenemhet – Sesostris (so-called Twelfth Dynasty).

 

 

What makes me wonder even more in the case of the above Eighteenth Dynasty repetitions is that Thutmose III and so-called IV, as well as bearing the same nomen (Thutmose, “Born of the god Thoth”), also had the same praenomen, Menkheperre (“Lasting are the Manifestations of Re”).

 

As well as that ‘they’ shared the Horus name, Kanakht.

 

Thutmose III had Syrian wives, Menhet, Menwi and Merti.

Thutmose IV had, amongst several, Merytra (Merti?).

 

The plot thickens.

 

Thutmose IV was also married to a (Syro-) Mitannian woman, Mutemwiya, a name of which I would suggest that the above, Menwi (M-ut-emwi-ya), was a hypocoristicon:

 

https://sites.google.com/site/historyofancientegypt/queens-of-egypt/mutemwia-wife-of-tuthmosis-iv

Queen Mutemwia is of unknown parentage. One theory identifies her with a daughter of King Artatama of Mitanni who is known to have married Pharaoh Tuthmosis IV. …. There is however no evidence for this theory. Others have suggested that she may have been related to Yuya, the father of Queen Tiye. This theory seems to date back to C. Aldred. He suggested that Mutemwia was a daughter of the Master of the Horse named Yey. This scenario would have Mutemwia as a secondary royal wife, who gives birth to a son and heir. During the early reign of her son Amenhotep III, she and her brother Yuya marry Amenhotep to his niece Tiye. This is a nice theory, but again, no firm evidence exists to validate any of these ideas.

 

Queen Mutemwia was likely a minor wife of Tuthmosis IV. During the reign of Tuthmosis IV we first see him accompanied by a Queen Nefertari and later by Queen Iaret. Mutemwia must have given birth to Prince Amenhotep failry early in the reign, and it seems that Prince Amenhotep was recognized by the king and may have even been designated crown prince.

 

Mutemwia becomes more important during the reign of her son Amenhotep III. Amenhotep came to the throne at a fairly young age (some suggest ca 8-10 years old). Mutemwia never takes on the official role of regent for her son, but she is depicted on several of his monuments.

[End of quote]

 

The ‘Syrian’ element may become most significant when (if) I continue to trace the origins and identification of Thutmose III and his son, Amenhotep.

 

Obviously the reign lengths, as conventionally assigned to Thutmose III, IV, differ greatly, with Thutmose III reigning for 54 years and Thutmose IV for only about a decade or less.

 

However, one finds some entirely new possible perspectives arising when one reads articles such as Betsy Bryan’s “The Reign of Thutmose IV” (1991):

https://www.academia.edu/37751598/The_Reign_of_Thutmose_IV telling of historians Wente and Van Siclen even allowing for the possibility of “a figure quadrupling the reign” of Thutmose IV.

 

CHRONOLOGY

 

For those most interested in interpretive history, the problem of chronology often delays discussion. For those, however, who recognize the pitfalls and rewards of examining chronological evidence, this introductory chapter will be expected and, I hope, appreciated--if not completely agreed to. How long did Thutmose IV reign? The traditional answer to this question has been about eight years, a figure corresponding both to the attested year dates and the Manethonian king lists. Recently, however, the chronology for the New Kingdom proposed by Wente and Van Siclen used a figure quadrupling the reign. …. Such a dramatic extension of Thutmose's years as ruler warrants full discussion before it is embraced or rejected. The discussion below, therefore, before passing on to the events, characters, and monuments of the period, will examine the evidence for Thutmose IV's length of rule and weigh the arguments bearing on his reign contained in the new chronology. ….

[End of quote]

 

Added to this, Brian Alm has noted that reliefs of pharaoh Thutmose IV actually refer to his Heb Sed festival (“Thutmose IV: Placeholder or Pivot?”).

 

This usually indicated that the King of Egypt had attained to three decades of reign: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Heb-Sed

“Heb-Sed, also called Sed Festival, one of the oldest feasts of ancient Egypt, celebrated by the king after 30 years of rule and repeated every 3 years thereafter. The festival was in the nature of a jubilee, and it is believed that the ceremonies represented a ritual reenactment of the unification of Egypt, traditionally accomplished by Menes”.

 

Brian Alm writes, imagining that this must have been “fake news”, however, on the part of the Pharaoh:

https://www.academia.edu/37751598/The_Reign_of_Thutmose_IV

 

[Thutmose IV] had reliefs put up at Amada, in Nubia, referring to his heb-sed Jubilee — even though he ruled only eight or ten years and had no sed observance, which technically was to commemorate a king’s 30th year of rule — “Jubilee by proxy,” Reeves calls it …. Yes, it’s true that kings did jump the gun and held the heb-sed early, while they were still fresh and able to assert their right to rule with youthful vigor, but it was still a bit too early for a king who had ruled at most ten years and was dead by the age of 25. It is also possible that the heb-sed was being expressed not as an event but as a wish for longevity. Nevertheless, real or imagined, the rite had been recorded and recognized, so it was “fact.” Today it might be called fake news, but it was an Egyptian convention to create truth by writing it, stamped with the magical di ankh, “given life,” to make it so. ….

 

If, however, Thutmose IV is to be merged with III, then “fake news” was not involved.

For Thutmose III certainly did celebrate a Heb Sed festival:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festival_Hall_of_Thutmose_III

“The Festival Hall of Thutmose III is situated at the end of the Middle Kingdom court, with its axis at right-angles to the main east–west axis of the temple. It was originally built to celebrate the jubilee (Heb-Sed) of the 18th dynasty Pharaoh, Thutmose III, and later became used as part of the annual Opet Festival.”

 

This all suggests to me that Thutmose so-called IV has been procrusteanised by over-zealous Egyptologists, lopped off too short, limbs truncated.

 

For a pharaoh who is thought to have reigned for approximately only 8 years, Thutmose IV was an incredibly prolific builder. Though, as is further thought: “Most of his work was adding to the temples of his father and grandfather …”: https://www.crystalinks.com/Thutmose_IV.html

Like most of the Thutmoside kings, he built on a grand scale. Thutmose IV completed the eastern obelisk first started by Thutmose III, which, at 32 m (105 ft), was the tallest obelisk ever erected in Egypt, at the Temple of Karnak. Thutmose IV called it the tekhen waty or 'unique obelisk.' It was transported to the grounds of the Circus Maximus in Rome by Emperor Constantius II in 357 AD and, later, "re-erected by Pope Sixtus V in 1588 at the Piazza San Giovanni" in the Vatican where it is today known as the 'Lateran Obelisk."

….

Thutmose IV also built a unique chapel and peristyle hall against the back or eastern walls of the main Karnak temple building. The chapel was intended "for people "who had no right of access to the main Karnak temple.

 

It was a 'place of the ear' for the god Amun where the god could hear the prayers of the townspeople." This small alabaster chapel of Thutmose IV has today been carefully restored by French scholars from the Centre Franco-Egyptien D'Etude des Temple de Karnak (CFEETK) mission in Karnak.

 

He also began work at most of Egypt’s major temple sites and four sites in Nubia, but almost all of this was simply adding to existing monuments. Most of his work was adding to the temples of his father and grandfather [sic], and perhaps suggesting new sites and monuments to his son.

 

Minor building projects [Thutmose IV]:

 

·       The Delta at Alexandria

·       Seriakus

·       Heliopolis

·       Giza

·       Abusir

·       Saqqara

·       Memphis

·       Crocodilopos in the Fayoum

·       Hermopolis

·       Amarna

·       Abydos (a chapel)

·       Dendera

·       Medamu

·       Karna

·       Luxor

·       The West Bank at Luxor (his tomb and mortuary temple)

·       Armant

·       Edfu

·       Elephantine

·       Konosso

 

Thutmose IV is like a microcosm of the great Thutmose III.

He is, in fact, Thutmose III procrusteanised, vertically challenged.   

 

Suspiciously, “little is known” about him:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thutmose_IV

“Little is known about his brief ten-year rule. He suppressed a minor uprising in Nubia in his 8th year (attested in his Konosso stela) around 1393 BC [sic] and was referred to in a stela as the Conqueror of Syria but little else has been pieced together about his military exploits. Betsy Bryan, who penned a biography of Thutmose IV, says that Thutmose IV's Konosso stela appears to refer to a minor desert patrol action on the part of the king's forces to protect certain gold-mine routes in Egypt's Eastern Desert from occasional attacks by the Nubians. …. Thutmose IV's rule is significant because he established peaceful relations with Mitanni and married a Mitannian princess to seal this new alliance”.

 

Numerous instances of Syro-Mitannian campaigning and booty collecting can be gleaned from a reading of Betsy Bryan’s article, “The Reign of Thutmose IV” - although the tendency is, again, as with Brian Alm’s article, to understate the likelihood of its being hard reality.    

 

Thutmose III was indeed a Conqueror of Syria:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thutmose_III#Conquest_of_Syria

 

The fifth, sixth and seventh campaigns of Thutmose III were directed against the Phoenician cities in Syria and against Kadesh on the Orontes. In Thutmose's 29th year, he began his fifth campaign, where he first took an unknown city (the name falls in a lacuna) which had been garrisoned by Tunip. …. He then moved inland and took the city and territory around Ardata … the town was pillaged and the wheatfields burned. Unlike previous plundering raids, Thutmose III garrisoned the area known as Djahy, which is probably a reference to southern Syria. …. This permitted him to ship supplies and troops between Syria and Egypt. Although there is no direct evidence for it, it is for this reason that some have supposed that Thutmose's sixth campaign, in his thirtieth year, commenced with a naval transportation of troops directly to Byblos, bypassing Canaan entirely. …. After the troops arrived in Syria by whatever means, they proceeded into the Jordan River valley and moved north, pillaging Kadesh's lands. ….

Turning west again, Thutmose took Simyra and quelled a rebellion in Ardata, which apparently had rebelled again. …. To stop such rebellions, Thutmose began taking hostages from the cities in Syria. The cities in Syria were not guided by the popular sentiment of the people so much as they were by the small number of nobles who were aligned to Mitanni: a king and a small number of foreign Maryannu.

 

Thutmose III found that by taking family members of these key people to Egypt as hostages, he could drastically increase their loyalty to him. …. Syria rebelled again in Thutmose's 31st year and he returned to Syria for his seventh campaign, took the port city of Ullaza and the smaller Phoenician ports … and took more measures to prevent further rebellions. …. All the excess grain which was produced in Syria was stored in the harbors he had recently conquered and was used for the support of the military and civilian Egyptian presence ruling Syria. …. This left the cities in Syria desperately impoverished. With their economies in ruins, they had no means of funding a rebellion. …”.