by
Damien F. Mackey
Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky was correct in identifying Ramses II
as a contemporary of King Nebuchednezzar the Chaldean.
In my previous article:
Assyrian contemporaries of Ramses II ‘the Great’
(5) Assyrian contemporaries of Ramses II 'the Great' | Damien Mackey - Academia.edu
a partner to this present one, I had concluded that:
• Pharaoh Ramses II ‘the Great’ was a younger contemporary of Shalmaneser; and he was
• an older contemporary of Sargon II/Sennacherib.
Ramses II was also to be identified as:
Ramses III;
Psibkhenno (Šilkanni);
Shabako;
“So king of Egypt”
His famous son, Khaemwaset, was all of:
Khaemwaset, son of Ramses III;
Si’be (turtan);
Shebitku Khaemwaset;
Shabataka (Tang-i Var)
Sargon II/Sennacherib, for his part, was also Tukulti-ninurta (and, as identified elsewhere) Shamsi-Adad (not I of that name).
The reign of Ramses II was so long (66-67 years), however, that it - having spanned the latter part of the reign of Shalmaneser and the entire reign of Sargon II/ Sennacherib - still had some approximately three further decades to run after that.
Now, according to Tobit 1, whose neo-Assyrian sequence I firmly follow, Sennacherib was succeeded by Esarhaddon, he being the king whose statue appeared alongside that of Ramses II at Nahr el-Kalb. Unlike convention and Dr. Velikovsky, I had Esarhaddon as a younger contemporary of Ramses II. I explained this in the companion article:
The Nahr el-Kalb inscription juxtaposes a statue of Ramses II alongside a statue of Esarhaddon.
- Conventional scholars presumably might argue that Ramses II is worn because he (c. 1280 BC, conventional dating) is much older than Esarhaddon (c. 680 BC, conventional dating).
- Dr. I. Velikovsky, who made Ramses II a contemporary of Nebuchednezzar (c. 580 BC, conventional dating), would have considered Ramses II as ruling later than Esarhaddon.
- I (Damien Mackey) have Ramses II as an older contemporary of Esarhaddon’s predecessor, Sargon II/Sennacherib. Esarhaddon, for his part, likely scratched out his foe, Ramses II, from the Nahr el-Kalb inscription.
This last point, Ramses II’s being contemporaneous with the Assyrian king, Sargon II/ Sennacherib, now needs to be explained. ….
[End of quote]
My Esarhaddon is also different in other ways from the conventional and Velikovskian versions of him.
For one, I do not believe that Esarhaddon was a biological son of Sennacherib, the Assyrian, but was a Chaldean, thereby commencing a new dynasty.
And, secondly, I have identified Esarhaddon as Nebuchednezzar the Chaldean:
Esarhaddon a tolerable fit for King Nebuchednezzar
(6) Esarhaddon a tolerable fit for King Nebuchednezzar | Damien Mackey - Academia.edu
Dr. Velikovsky’s thesis in Ramses II and His Time (1978), that Ramses II was a contemporary of Nebuchednezzar, accords perfectly with my own reconstruction, insofar as I have Ramses II as a contemporary of Esarhaddon, my Nebuchednezzar.
Despite my manifold identifications of Ramses II (as given above), I have not followed Dr. Velikovsky, though, in his view that Ramses was the same as pharaoh Necho of Egypt’s Twenty-Sixth Dynasty, also a contemporary of Nebuchednezzar.
In my article, “The Complete Ramses II”, I had identified Ramses II, instead, as Tirhakah of the Twenty-Fifth Dynasty, who is also Piankhi.
Two more mighty identifications of Ramses II to be added to the list.
Nor have I been able to accept Dr. Velikovsky’s ingenious thesis that Nebuchadnezzar was Hattusilis, the Hittite emperor, who famously made a treaty with Ramses II.
The Chaldean dynasty consisted only of Nebuchednezzar and his son, Belshazzar.
The latter, who is also Amēl-Marduk, is referred to in Baruch 1:11, 12:
… and pray for the life of King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon and for the life of his son Belshazzar, so that their days on earth may be like the days of heaven. The Lord will give us strength and light to our eyes; we shall live under the protection of King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon and under the protection of his son Belshazzar, and we shall serve them many days and find favor in their sight.
Ramses II was thus a contemporary also of the second Chaldean king, Belshazzar, but only while Belshazzar was yet a prince.
King Belshazzar was subsequently succeeded by the Medo-Persian king (Daniel 5:31).
No comments:
Post a Comment